C.F.R. » Title 46 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER A—PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO THE PUBLIC › PART 4—MARINE CASUALTIES AND INVESTIGATIONS › Subpart 4.19—Construction of Regulations and Rules of Evidence

46 C.F.R. § 4.19-5

Adherence to rules of evidence

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As hearings under this part are administrative in character, strict adherence to the formal rules of evidence is not imperative. However, in the interest of orderly presentation of the facts of a case, the rules of evidence should be observed as closely as possible.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. Atina M/V (E.D. La. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. Atina M/V (E.D. La. 2023). “See 46 C.F.R. § 4.19-5 (providing that “strict adherence to the formal rules of evidence is not imperative” at marine casualty investigation hearings).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.