47 C.F.R. § 0.203

Authority of person, panel, or board to which functions are delegated

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The person, panel, or board to which functions are delegated shall, with respect to such functions, have all the jurisdiction, powers, and authority conferred by law upon the Commission, and shall be subject to the same duties and obligations.

(b) Except as provided in § 1.102 of this chapter, any action taken pursuant to delegated authority shall have the same force and effect and shall be made, evidenced, and enforced in the same manner as actions of the Commission.

[28 FR 12402, Nov. 22, 1963]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2022 · leading case: Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Sys., LP, 931 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Sys., LP, 931 F.3d 1094 (11th Cir. 2019). “47 C.F.R. § 0.203 (b). The order "eliminate[d] the Commission's rule requiring opt-out notices on faxes sent with the recipients' prior permission or consent.”

Northampton Media Assocs. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Cutter Broad., Inc., Intervenor, 941 F.2d 1214 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “” 47 C.F.R. § 0.203 (1990); see id. §§ 0.161, 0.”

IN Bell Tele Co v. McCarty, William D., 362 F.3d 378 (7th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “47 C.F.R. § 0.203 . See also 47 U.S.C. § 155 (c)(3) (“Any order, decision, report, or action made or taken pursuant to any such delegation [of authority] .”

Scoma Chiropractic, P.A. v. Dental Equities, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2021). “3d at 1104 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 0.203 (b)). The Supreme Court of the United States further explains: When a court reviews an agency’s construction of the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions.”

Scoma Chiropractic, P.A. v. Nat'l Spine & Pain Centers LLC (M.D. Fla. 2022). “2019) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 0.203 (b)). Further, the first step in the Chevron analysis is satisfied because Congress has not “directly spoken to the precise question at issue” and its intent is not clear.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.