47 C.F.R. § 1.225

Participation by non-parties; consideration of communications

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person who wishes to appear and give evidence on any matter and who so advises the Secretary, will be notified by the Secretary if that matter is designated for hearing. In the case of requests bearing more than one signature, notice of hearing will be given to the person first signing unless the request indicates that such notice should be sent to someone other than such person.

(b) No persons shall be precluded from giving any relevant, material, and competent testimony because they lack a sufficient interest to justify their intervention as parties in the matter.

(c) No communication will be considered in determining the merits of any matter unless it has been received into evidence. The admissibility of any communication shall be governed by the applicable rules of evidence in § 1.351, and no communication shall be admissible on the basis of a stipulation unless Commission counsel as well as counsel for all of the parties shall join in such stipulation.

[28 FR 12425, Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 85 FR 63175, Oct. 6, 2020]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1966–1976 · leading case: Spanish Int'l Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Int'l Panorama Tv, Inc., Intervenor, 385 F.2d 615 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Spanish Int'l Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Int'l Panorama Tv, Inc., Intervenor, 385 F.2d 615 (D.C. Cir. 1967). · cites it 3× “* * * If, in the opinion of the presiding officer, good cause is shown for the delay in filing, he may in his discretion grant such petition or may permit intervention limited to particular issues or to a particular stage of the proceeding.”

Comm. for Open Media v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Chronicle Broad. Co., Intervenor, 543 F.2d 861 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.225 (1974). The only prerequisite to intervention during a hearing is that the applicant show good cause why the petition to intervene was not submitted within thirty days of public notice of the hearing issues or a substantial amendment thereto.”

Off. of Commc'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 359 F.2d 994 (D.C. Cir. 1966). “47 C.F.R. § 1.225 (1965). . See 30 Fed.Reg.”

— 47 C.F.R. § 1.225(b) — 1 case

Spanish Int'l Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Int'l Panorama Tv, Inc., Intervenor, 385 F.2d 615 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “* * * If, in the opinion of the presiding officer, good cause is shown for the delay in filing, he may in his discretion grant such petition or may permit intervention limited to particular issues or to a particular stage of the proceeding.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.