47 C.F.R. § 1.420

Additional procedures in proceedings for amendment of the Table of FM Allotments, the Table of TV Allotments, or for amendment of certain FM assignments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Link to an amendment published at 91 FR 29044, May 19, 2026.

(a) Comments filed in proceedings for amendment of the Table of FM Allotments (§ 73.202 of this chapter) or the Table of TV Allotments (§ 73.622(j) of this chapter) which are initiated on a petition for rule making shall be served on petitioner by the person who files the comments.

(b) Reply comments filed in proceedings for amendment of the Table of FM Allotments or the Table of TV Allotments shall be served on the person(s) who filed the comments to which the reply is directed.

(c) Such comments and reply comments shall be accompanied by a certificate of service.

(d) Counterproposals shall be advanced in initial comments only and will not be considered if they are advanced in reply comments.

(e) An original and 4 copies of all petitions for rulemaking, comments, reply comments, and other pleadings shall be filed with the Commission.

(f) Petitions for reconsideration and responsive pleadings shall be served on parties to the proceeding and on any licensee or permittee whose authorization may be modified to specify operation on a different channel, and shall be accompanied by a certificate of service.

(g) The Commission may modify the license or permit of a UHF TV station to a VHF channel in the same community in the course of the rule making proceeding to amend § 73.622(j), or it may modify the license or permit of an FM station to another class of channel through notice and comment procedures, if any of the following conditions are met:

(1) There is no other timely filed expression of interest, or

(2) If another interest in the proposed channel is timely filed, an additional equivalent class of channel is also allotted, assigned or available for application.

Note 1 to paragraph (g):

In certain situations, a licensee or permittee may seek an adjacent, intermediate frequency or co-channel upgrade by application. See § 73.203(b) of this chapter.

(h) Where licensees (or permittees) of television broadcast stations jointly petition to amend § 73.622(j) and to exchange channels, and where one of the licensees (or permittees) operates on a commercial channel while the other operates on a reserved noncommercial educational channel within the same band, and the stations serve substantially the same market, then the Commission may amend § 73.606(b) or § 73.622(j) and modify the licenses (or permits) of the petitioners to specify operation on the appropriate channels upon a finding that such action will promote the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

Note 2 to paragraph (h):

Licensees and permittees operating Class A FM stations who seek to upgrade their facilities to Class B1, B, C3, C2, C1, or C on Channel 221, and whose proposed 1 mV/m signal contours would overlap the Grade B contour of a television station operating on Channel 6 must meet a particularly heavy burden by demonstrating that grants of their upgrade requests are in the public interest. In this regard, the Commission will examine the record in rule making proceedings to determine the availability of existing and potential non-commercial education service.

(i) In the course of the rule making proceeding to amend § 73.202(b) or § 73.622(j), the Commission may modify the license or permit of an FM or television broadcast station to specify a new community of license where the amended allotment would be mutually exclusive with the licensee's or permittee's present assignment.

(j) Whenever an expression of interest in applying for, constructing, and operating a station has been filed in a proceeding to amend the Table of FM Allotments or the Table of TV Allotments, and the filing party seeks to dismiss or withdraw the expression of interest, either unilaterally or in exchange for financial consideration, that party must file with the Commission a request for approval of the dismissal or withdrawal, a copy of any written agreement related to the dismissal or withdrawal, and an affidavit setting forth:

(1) A certification that neither the party withdrawing its interest nor its principals has received or will receive any money or other consideration in excess of legitimate and prudent expenses in exchange for the dismissal or withdrawal of the expression of interest;

(2) The exact nature and amount of any consideration received or promised;

(3) An itemized accounting of the expenses for which it seeks reimbursement; and

(4) The terms of any oral agreement related to the dismissal or withdrawal of the expression of interest.

(5) In addition, within 5 days of a party's request for approval, each remaining party to any written or oral agreement must submit an affidavit setting forth:

(i) A certification that neither it nor its principals has paid or will pay money or other consideration in excess of the legitimate and prudent expenses of the party withdrawing its expression of interest; and

(ii) The terms of any oral agreement relating to the dismissal or withdrawal of the expression of interest.

Note 3 to § 1.420:

The reclassification of a Class C station in accordance with the procedure set forth in Note 4 to § 73.3573 of this chapter may be initiated through the filing of an original petition for amendment of the Table of FM Allotments. The Commission will notify the affected Class C station licensee of the proposed reclassification by issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking, except that where a triggering petition proposes an amendment or amendments to the Table of FM Allotments in addition to the proposed reclassification, the Commission will issue an order to show cause as set forth in Note 4 to § 73.3573 of this chapter, and a notice of proposed rulemaking will be issued only after the reclassification issue is resolved. Triggering petitions will be dismissed upon the filing, rather than the grant, of an acceptable construction permit application to increase antenna height to at least 451 meters HAAT by a subject Class C station.

(Secs. 4, 303, 307, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082, 1083; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307) [39 FR 44022, Dec. 20, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 53391, Nov. 18, 1975; 41 FR 1287, Jan. 7, 1976; 51 FR 15629, Apr. 25, 1986; 51 FR 20291, June 4, 1986; 52 FR 8260, Mar. 17, 1987; 52 FR 25866, July 9, 1987; 54 FR 16366, Apr. 24, 1989; 54 FR 26201, June 22, 1989; 55 FR 28914, July 16, 1990; 58 FR 38535, July 19, 1993; 59 FR 59503, Nov. 17, 1994; 61 FR 43472, Aug. 23, 1996; 65 FR 79776, Dec. 20, 2000; 71 FR 76215, Dec. 20, 2006; 86 FR 66194, Nov. 22, 2021; 91 FR 29044, May 19, 2026]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1985–2008 · leading case: Crawford v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 417 F.3d 1289 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Crawford v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 417 F.3d 1289 (D.C. Cir. 2005). · cites it 5× “20, 1974); see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.420 . The process begins with an FCC notice of proposed rulemak-ing (NPRM), often in response to a broadcaster’s petition.”
North Texas Media, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Denton Fm Radio, Ltd., Intervenor, 778 F.2d 28 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “At the time of the proceedings in dispute, section 73.203(b) of the Commission’s rules permitted applicants to apply for the use of an FM channel either in the community to which it had been assigned in the FM table of assignments, or in any other community within 15 miles of…”
Coalition for Noncommercial Media v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 249 F.3d 1005 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “2d (P & F) 1455, 1986 WL 291350 (1986); see also 47 CFR § 1.420 (h). The Association operates two noncommercial television stations in Buffalo, New York — WNEQ-TV on Channel 23, which was reserved for noncommercial educational use, and WNED-TV on Channel 17, which was unreserved.”
Sangre De Cristo Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 139 F.3d 953 (D.C. Cir. 1998). · cites it 2× “In September 1992 USC (which had yet to begin construction on Cheyenne Mountain) and appellant Sangre de Cristo, the licensee of commercial television station KOAA-TV, Channel 5, 4 sought to exchange channels pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.420 (h). 5 Under their proposal, the…”
Rainbow Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 949 F.2d 405 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “” 47 C.F.R. § 1.420 (h). Stating that it adopted the Policy as a rescue effort for educational broadcasting in the wake of decreases in federal funding, the FCC designed the Policy to facilitate channel exchanges between commercial and noncommercial stations in which funding…”
Crawford v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 304 F. App'x 882 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “15809 (2000) (“Quanah NPRM”), and the FCC’s regulations, 47 C.F.R. § 1.420 (d), “put all interested parties on notice that their proposals could be precluded by any counter proposal — whether foreseeable or not— that was filed by the deadline, mutually exclusive with the Quanah…”
Crawford v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 304 F. App'x 882 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “15809 (2000) (“Quanah NPRM”), and the FCC’s regulations, 47 C.F.R. § 1.420 (d), “put all interested parties on notice that their proposals could be precluded by any counter proposal — whether foreseeable or not— that was filed by the deadline, mutually exclusive with the Quanah…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.