47 C.F.R. § 2.803

Marketing of radio frequency devices prior to equipment authorization

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Marketing, as used in this section, includes sale or lease, or offering for sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment, or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.

(b) General rule. No person may market a radio frequency device unless the radio frequency device is authorized pursuant to a valid FCC equipment authorization that has not been limited through the procedures described in § 2.939(e) of this chapter, and:

(1) For devices subject to authorization under certification, the device has been authorized in accordance with the rules in subpart J of this chapter and is properly identified and labeled as required by § 2.925 and other relevant sections in this chapter; or

(2) For devices subject to authorization under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity in accordance with the rules in subpart J of this part, the device complies with all applicable technical, labeling, identification and administrative requirements; or

(3) For devices that do not require a grant of equipment authorization under subpart J of this chapter but must comply with the specified technical standards prior to use, the device complies with all applicable, technical, labeling, identification and administrative requirements.

(c) Exceptions. The following marketing activities are permitted prior to equipment authorization:

(1) Activities conducted under market trials pursuant to subpart H of part 5 of this chapter or in accordance with a Spectrum Horizons experimental radio license issued pursuant to subpart I of part 5.

(2) Limited marketing is permitted, as described in the following text, for devices that could be authorized under the current rules; could be authorized under waivers of such rules that are in effect at the time of marketing; or could be authorized under rules that have been adopted by the Commission but that have not yet become effective. These devices may not be operated unless permitted by § 2.805.

(i) Conditional sales contracts (including agreements to produce new devices manufactured in accordance with designated specifications), and advertisements for such sales, are permitted under the following conditions:

(A) The initiating party must provide to the prospective buyer at the time of marketing, through a prominent disclosure:

(1) Notification that the equipment is subject to the FCC rules and delivery to the end user is conditional upon successful completion of the applicable equipment authorization process;

(2) Notification that FCC rules do not address the applicability of consumer protection, contractual, or other provisions under federal or state law; and

(3) Notification of any responsibility of the initiating party to the buyer in the event that the applicable equipment authorization process is not successfully completed, including information regarding any applicable refund policy.

(B) For devices subject to Supplier Declaration of Conformity procedures under subpart J of this chapter, physical transfer of equipment from the initiating party to other entities, including delivery to the end user, prior to successful completion of the equipment authorization process is prohibited.

(C) For devices subject to Certification procedures under subpart J of this chapter, delivery to the end user prior to successful completion of the equipment authorization process is prohibited; transfer of physical possession of devices to other entities for the sole purpose of pre-sale activity is permitted only after compliance testing by an FCC-recognized accredited testing laboratory is completed and an application for Certification is submitted to an FCC-recognized Telecommunication Certification Body pursuant to § 2.911. Pre-sale activity includes packaging and transferring physical possession of devices to distribution centers and retailers. Pre-sale activity does not include display or demonstration of devices.

(1) Each device, or its packaging, physically transferred for the purpose of pre-sale activity must prominently display a visible temporary removable label stating: “This device cannot be delivered to end users, displayed, or operated until the device receives certification from the FCC. Under penalty of law, this label must not be removed prior to receiving an FCC certification grant.”

(2) The first party to initiate a conditional sales contract under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section or to physically transfer devices must have processes in place to retrieve the equipment in the event that the equipment is not successfully certified and must complete such retrieval immediately after a determination is made that the equipment certification cannot be successfully completed.

(D) Notwithstanding § 2.926, radiofrequency devices marketed pursuant to paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section may include the expected FCC ID if obscured by the temporary label described in paragraph (c)(2)(i)(C)(1) of this section or, in the case of electronic labeling, if the expected FCC ID cannot be viewed prior to authorization.

(E) All radiofrequency devices marketed under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section must remain under legal ownership of the first party to initiate a conditional sales contract.

(F) The first party to initiate a conditional sales contract or any party that physically transfers devices under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section must maintain, for a period of sixty (60) months, records of each conditional sale contract. Such records must identify the device name and product identifier, the quantity conditionally sold, the date on which the device authorization was sought, the expected FCC ID number, and the identity of the conditional buyer, including contact information. The first party to initiate a conditional sales contract or any party that physically transfers devices under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section must provide these records upon the request of Commission personnel.

(ii) [Reserved]

(iii) (A) A radio frequency device may be advertised or displayed, (e.g., at a trade show or exhibition) if accompanied by a conspicuous notice containing this language:

This device has not been authorized as required by the rules of the Federal Communications Commission. This device is not, and may not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased, until authorization is obtained.

(B) If the device being displayed is a prototype of a device that has been properly authorized and the prototype, itself, is not authorized due to differences between the prototype and the authorized device, this language may be used instead: Prototype. Not for Sale.

(iv) An evaluation kit as defined in § 2.1 may be sold provided that:

(A) Sales are limited to product developers, software developers, and system integrators;

(B) The following notice is included with the kit:

FCC NOTICE: This kit is designed to allow:

(1) Product developers to evaluate electronic components, circuitry, or software associated with the kit to determine whether to incorporate such items in a finished product and

(2) Software developers to write software applications for use with the end product. This kit is not a finished product and when assembled may not be resold or otherwise marketed unless all required FCC equipment authorizations are first obtained. Operation is subject to the condition that this product not cause harmful interference to licensed radio stations and that this product accept harmful interference. Unless the assembled kit is designed to operate under part 15, part 18 or part 95 of this chapter, the operator of the kit must operate under the authority of an FCC license holder or must secure an experimental authorization under part 5 of this chapter.

(C) The kit is labeled with the following legend: For evaluation only; not FCC approved for resale; and

(D) Any radiofrequency transmitter employed as part of an evaluation kit shall be designed to comply with all applicable FCC technical rules, including frequency use, spurious and out-of-band emission limits, and maximum power or field strength ratings applicable to final products that would employ the components or circuitry to be evaluated.

(d) Importation. The provisions of subpart K of this part continue to apply to imported radio frequency devices.

[78 FR 25161, Apr. 29, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 48691, Aug. 18, 2014; 80 FR 52414, Aug. 31, 2015; 82 FR 50825, Nov. 2, 2017; 84 FR 25689, June 4, 2019; 86 FR 52099, Sept. 20, 2021; 87 FR 21580, Apr. 12, 2022; 90 FR 53236, Nov. 25, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1976–2010 · leading case: Farina v. Nokia, Inc., 625 F.3d 97 (3rd Cir. 2010).
Farina v. Nokia, Inc., 625 F.3d 97 (3rd Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “1093 (d), and all cell phones sold in the United States must comply with those regulations, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 (a)(1), 24.51-.52. C. The complaint before us in this appeal is Farina’s Third Amended Complaint.”
Pinney v. Nokia, Inc., 402 F.3d 430 (4th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “While wireless telephones must meet the FCC’s specifications and be authorized by the FCC before they can be sold, see 47 C.F.R. § 2.803 , these provisions do not provide a remedy to someone injured by a defective wireless telephone.”
Elec. Indus. Ass'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 554 F.2d 1109 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “§ 302a (1970) and 47 C.F.R. § 2.803 (1975), is required to incur expenses for testing or inspection, such expenses can be charged in full to the applicant.”
United States v. Ranger Elec. Commc'ns, Inc., 22 F. Supp. 2d 667 (W.D. Mich. 1998). · cites it 2× “47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 95.603. The radios in question were not type accepted by the FCC and would not have been type accepted by the FCC because they broadcast on frequencies other than those approved by the FCC for CB broadcast (between 26.”
United States of Am., Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Ranger Elec. Commc'ns, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, 210 F.3d 627 (6th Cir. 2000). “See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 and 95.603. The government argued the radios that were specified in the indictments were “open” radios, which operate illegally in that they are not restricted to the forty CB bands, but operate on additional channels as well.”
Cent. & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n, Inc. v. United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n, 777 F.2d 722 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “§ 302 (a) (1970) and 47 C.F.R. § 2.803 (1975), is required to incur expenses for testing or inspection, such expenses can be charged in full to the applicant.”
Transp. Intelligence, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 336 F.3d 1058 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “” See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 (a), 2.907; see generally id.”
Radar Solutions, Ltd. v. United States Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 628 F. Supp. 2d 714 (W.D. Tex. 2009). · cites it 5× “” 47 C.F.R. § 2.803 (a). The regulations further state that “[u]nless specifically exempted, the operation or marketing of an intentional or unintentional radiator that is not in compliance” with the relevant provisions of 47 C.”
United States v. Ranger Elec (6th Cir. 2000). “See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803 & Whitney, 489 U.S. 169, 179 (1989) (concluding that an and 95.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.