47 C.F.R. § 2.921
Hearing on application
Whenever it is determined that an application for equipment authorization presents substantial factual questions relating to the qualifications of the applicant or the equipment (or the effects of the use thereof), the Commission may designate the application for hearing. A hearing on an application for an equipment authorization shall be conducted in the same manner as a hearing on a radio station application as set out in subpart B of part 1 of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Transp. Intelligence, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 336 F.3d 1058 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
Transp. Intelligence, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 336 F.3d 1058 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “” 47 C.F.R. § 2.921 (emphasis added). 9 As is apparent on its face, the regulation does not contain the language that led the Astroline court to conclude that the agency must follow a two-step test in deciding whether to designate a hearing for a broadcast license.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.