47 C.F.R. § 32.5081

End user revenue

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This account shall contain federally and state tariffed monthly flat rate charge assessed upon end users.

(b) Subsidiary record categories shall be maintained in order that the company may separately report amounts related to federal and state tariffed charges.

[67 FR 5692, Feb. 6, 2002]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2002–2009 · leading case: Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Combs, 270 S.W.3d 249 (Tex. App. 2008).
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Combs, 270 S.W.3d 249 (Tex. App. 2008). “13 See 47 C.F.R. § 32.5081 (2001). The EUCL charge is paid by local subscribers whether any long distance call is actually made or received.”
David Medina v. State of Texas (Tex. App. 2002). “(footnote: 13) See 47 C.F.R. § 32.5081 (2001). The EUCL charge is paid by local subscribers whether any long distance call is actually made or received.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Susan Combs, Successor to Carole Strayhorn, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Greg Abbott, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2008). “13 See 47 C.F.R. § 32.5081 (2001). The EUCL charge is paid by local subscribers whether any long distance call is actually made or received.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Susan Combs, Successor to Carole Strayhorn, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Greg Abbott, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2008). “(footnote: 13) See 47 C.F.R. § 32.5081 (2001). The EUCL charge is paid by local subscribers whether any long distance call is actually made or received.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Susan Combs, Successor to Carole Strayhorn, Comptroller of Pub. Accounts of the State of Texas & Greg Abbott, Attorney Gen. of the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2008). “See 47 C.F.R. § 32.5081 (2001). The EUCL charge is paid by local subscribers whether any long distance call is actually made or received.”
Alton Armstrong v. State (Tex. App. 2009). “See 47 C.F.R. § 32.5081 (2001). The EUCL charge is paid by local subscribers whether any long distance call is actually made or received.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.