47 C.F.R. § 51.205

Dialing parity: General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A local exchange carrier (LEC) shall provide local dialing parity to competing providers of telephone exchange service, with no unreasonable dialing delays. Dialing parity shall be provided for originating telecommunications services that require dialing to route a call.

[83 FR 42052, Aug. 20, 2018]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: Worldcom, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 238 F.3d 449 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Worldcom, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 238 F.3d 449 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.205 , 209, .211, .213. Upon meeting this requirement for all interLATA and intraLATA toll services, an LEC’s provision of these services is removed from price cap regulation.”
AirTouch Paging v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 234 F.3d 815 (2d Cir. 2000). “” 47 C.F.R. § 51.205 (2000); Second Report, 11 F.”
The People of the v. FCC (8th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 251 (b)(3) (statutory dialing parity requirement); 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.205 - 51.215 (1996) (FCC dialing parity rules).”
Pub. Serv. Tel. Co. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (N.D. Ga. 2010). “nd the Alltel Agreement, finding that Section IV(B)(S) of the Alltel Agreement does not provide that calls to the 478-672 numbers should be rated as toll calls, and that PSTC’s attempt to re-rate calls that were locally rated prior to the effective date of the Alltel Agreement…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.