C.F.R. » Title 47 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—COMMON CARRIER SERVICES › PART 51—INTERCONNECTION › Subpart D—Additional Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers

47 C.F.R. § 51.303

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2000 · leading case: At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366 (1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366 (1999). · cites it 2× “See 47 CFR §§ 51.303 , 51.405, and 51.205— 51.”
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 219 F.3d 744 (8th Cir. 2000). · cites it 4× “405 , regarding rural exemptions; (3) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 51.303 , regarding preexisting agreements; and (4) various unbundling rules, including the superior quality rules and the combination of network elements rule, were contrary to…”
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “See First Report and Order, ¶¶ 165, 166, 169; 47 C.F.R. § 51.303 (stating FCC’s interpretation of subsection 252(a)(1)).”
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC (8th Cir. 2000). · cites it 4× “405 , regarding rural exemptions; (3) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 51.303 , regarding preexisting agreements; and (4) various unbundling rules, including the superior quality rules and the combination of network elements rule, were contrary to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.