47 C.F.R. § 51.501
Scope
(a) The rules in this subpart apply to the pricing of network elements, interconnection, and methods of obtaining access to unbundled elements, including physical collocation and virtual collocation.
(b) As used in this subpart, the term “element” includes network elements, interconnection, and methods of obtaining interconnection and access to unbundled elements.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2005–2017 · leading case: Sprintcom, Inc. v. Commissioners of the Illinois Com. Comm'n, 790 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2015).
Sprintcom, Inc. v. Commissioners of the Illinois Com. Comm'n, 790 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2015). “A Sprint caller would dial a Bell customer and the call would travel to the latter through the interconnected transmission systems of the two carriers. To make the interconnection requirement as inexpensive for new entrants as possible, the FCC further forbade local exchange…”
Indiana Bell Tel. Co. v. Stephan, 247 F. Supp. 3d 978 (S.D. Ind. 2017). “First, the requesting party sends a request to negotiate. 47 U.S.C. § 252 (a)(1).”
Ace Tel. Assoc. v. Leroy Koppendrayer, 432 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 2005). “47 C.F.R. §§ 51.501 , 51.505. To make sure that competitors make efficient investment and operating decisions, it is vital that competing telephone companies, when leasing equipment, face the same costs that the ILEC faces: For instance, if Qwest (an ILEC) incurs some small cost…”
SprintCom, Inc. v. Brian J. Sheahan (7th Cir. 2015). “47 C.F.R. §§ 51.501 , 51.503. Such a rate, gener- ated by a complicated regulatory formula, see 47 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.