47 C.F.R. § 51.717
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1999–2012 · leading case: Autotel v. Nevada Bell Tel. Co., 697 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2012).
Autotel v. Nevada Bell Tel. Co., 697 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2012). “Because Autotel had such an arrangement with AT & T Nevada at all relevant times, AT & T Nevada had no obligation to provide Autotel an interim arrangement with symmetrical rates.”
U S West Commc'ns, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 75 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (D. Utah 1999). “In its entirety, 47 C.F.R. § 51.717 provides: (a) Any CMRS provider that operates under an arrangement with an LEC that was established before August 8, 1996, and that provides for non-reciprocal compensation for transport and termination of local telecommunications traffic is…”
W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Qwest Corp., 734 F. Supp. 2d 1139 (D. Or. 2010). “Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 51.717 (b), a wireless provider may charge an ILEC the same rates for terminating telecommunications traffic that the ILEC charged to the wireless provider from the date the wireless provider requested the ILEC to negotiate a new agreement until the date…”
— 47 C.F.R. § 51.717(b) — 1 case
Autotel v. Nevada Bell Tel. Co., 697 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2012). “Because Autotel had such an arrangement with AT & T Nevada at all relevant times, AT & T Nevada had no obligation to provide Autotel an interim arrangement with symmetrical rates.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.