47 C.F.R. § 51.901
Purpose and scope of transitional access service pricing rules
(a) The purpose of this section is to establish rules governing the transition of intercarrier compensation from a calling-party's-network pays system to a default bill-and-keep methodology. Following the transition, the exchange of traffic between and among service providers will, by default, be governed by bill-and-keep arrangements.
(b) Effective December 29, 2011, the provisions of this subpart apply to reciprocal compensation for telecommunications traffic exchanged between telecommunications providers that is interstate or intrastate exchange access, information access, or exchange services for such access, other than special access.
See FCC 11-161, figure 9 (chart identifying steps in the transition).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2016–2020 · leading case: At&t Corp. v. Fcc, 970 F.3d 344 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
At&t Corp. v. Fcc, 970 F.3d 344 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “” 47 C.F.R. § 51.901 (b). Aureon provides interstate and intrastate “exchange access … services.”
In re: IntraMTA Switched Acces, 961 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 2020). “” 30 Those rules allowed LECs to continue imposing terminating access 30 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.901 et seq. (2013). “Access Reciprocal Compensation means tel- ecommunications traffic exchanged between telecommunications service providers that is interstate or intrastate exchange…”
At&t Corp. v. Fcc (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “” 47 C.F.R. § 51.901 (b). Aureon provides interstate and intrastate “exchange access … services.”
Teliax, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 220 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (D. Colo. 2016). “To support that contention, AT & T points to 47 C.F.R. § 51.901 (b), which limits the scope of transitional access service pricing rule to “interstate or intrastate exchange access, information access, or exchange services for such access .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.