C.F.R. » Title 47 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—COMMON CARRIER SERVICES › PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS › Subpart FF—Incarcerated People's Communications Services

47 C.F.R. § 64.6090

Flat-Rate Calling

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 77365, Sept. 20, 2024.

No Provider shall offer Flat-Rate Calling for interstate or international Inmate Calling Services.

[85 FR 67462, Oct. 23, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Rindahl v. Reisch (D.S.D. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rindahl v. Reisch (D.S.D. 2025). · cites it 3× “6110; (ii) that ViaPath allegedly violated the FCA by charging a flat-rate for calls as prohibited by 47 C.F.R.§ 64.6090; and (iii) that ViaPath allegedly breached a contract by failing to provide Rindahl a cash prize purportedly offered through a third-party gaming service’s…”
Rindahl v. Reisch (D.S.D. 2024). · cites it 2× “6110 and his flat-rate billing claim against GTL under 47 C.F.R. § 64.6090 , his motion for Rule 15 supplemental pleading, Doc.”
Rindahl v. Noem (D.S.D. 2020). “Rindahl has not stated a claim under 47 C.F.R. § 64.6090 because he does not allege that GTL has engaged in flat-rate billing.”
Rindahl v. Reisch (D.S.D. 2025). “6110 and flat-rate billing under 47 C.F.R. § 64.6090 . Doc. 276 at 4-5. Thus, Rindahl’s motion to amend, Doc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.