(a) Authorized end user device means a handset or other end user device that is authorized by the provider of a covered service for use with that service and is able to send, receive, and display text.
(b) CMRS provider means a CMRS provider as defined in § 20.18(c) of this chapter.
(c) Covered service means a service that meets accessibility requirements by supporting RTT pursuant to part 6, 7, 14, 20, or 64 of this chapter.
(d) RFC 4103 means IETF's Request for Comments (RFC) 4103 (incorporated by reference, see § 67.3 of this part).
(e) RFC 4103-conforming service or user device means a covered service or authorized end user device that enables initiation, sending, transmission, reception, and display of RTT communications in conformity with RFC 4103.
(f) RFC 4103-TTY gateway means a gateway that is able to reliably and accurately transcode communications between (1) RFC 4103-conforming services and devices and (2) circuit-switched networks that support communications between TTYs.
(g) Real-time text (RTT) or RTT communications means text communications that are transmitted over Internet Protocol (IP) networks immediately as they are created, e.g., on a character-by-character basis.
(h) Support RTT or support RTT communications means to enable users to initiate, send, transmit, receive, and display RTT communications in accordance with the applicable provisions of this part.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. W. Elec. Co., Inc., 569 F. Supp. 1057 (D.D.C. 1983).
“Under existing procedures for allocating property costs, revenues, expenses, and reserves between intrastate and interstate jurisdictions for rate making purposes (see 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 ), a disproportionately small amount of equal access and network reconfiguration costs would…”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 448 A.2d 272 (Me. 1982).
“The FCC has incorporated by reference the Separations Manual as Part 67 of its rules and regulations, 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 (1981), and the Maine Commission concedes that it is normally guided by the Separations Manual in its separations determinations.”
New York Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 631 F.2d 1059 (2d Cir. 1980).
“The Manual, which is published by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) and approved by the FCC, has been revised and is incorporated into the FCC’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 (1979). See Jurisdictional Separations of Telephone Companies, 16 F.”
New York Tel. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 464 N.E.2d 428 (NY 1984).
“The Joint Board has issued a Separations Manual establishing procedures for division of expenses, which has the force of Federal regulation (47 CFR 67.1). Two of the expense factors requiring division between interstate and intrastate calls involve the time spent by operators in…”
S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 453 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1984).
“See 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 (1982). For several years prior to the development of the current dispute, a course of dealing had been followed by Southern Bell and General Telephone under which they divided their long-distance service revenues on the basis of periodic five-day study…”
City of Brookings Mun. Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 822 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
“at 275, 285; see also 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 (c) (1986). Finally, NECA asserted, the revisions reflected the logic of the system of access charges outlined in part 69 of the Commission’s Rules.”
Hawaiian Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n of State of Hawaii, 827 F.2d 1264 (9th Cir. 1987).
“1(e) of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations, 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 (e), IS AMENDED to read as follows: These Separations Procedures apply to Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Alaska and Hawaii.”
MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 712 F.2d 517 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
“interstate calls plus a portion of the remaining revenues which provides the carrier’s return element and which is based upon its share of the total investment of all carriers providing interstate service.”
Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 584 F. Supp. 1087 (E.D. Ark. 1984).
“The plaintiff sued for declaratory judgment and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief for the defendants’ failure to comply with orders of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and with 47 C.F.R. § 67.1 and the Separations Manual adopted by the FCC.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.