47 C.F.R. § 68.110

Compatibility of the public switched telephone network and terminal equipment

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Availability of interface information. Technical information concerning interface parameters not specified by the technical criteria published by the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments, that are needed to permit terminal equipment to operate in a manner compatible with the communications facilities of a provider of wireline telecommunications, shall be provided by the provider of wireline telecommunications upon request.

(b) Availability of inside wiring information. Any available technical information concerning wiring on the customer side of the demarcation point, including copies of existing schematic diagrams and service records, shall be provided by the provider of wireline telecommunications upon request of the building owner or agent thereof. The provider of wireline telecommunications may charge the building owner a reasonable fee for this service, which shall not exceed the cost involved in locating and copying the documents. In the alternative, the provider of wireline telecommunications may make these documents available for review and copying by the building owner. In this case, the provider of wireline telecommunications may charge a reasonable fee, which shall not exceed the cost involved in making the documents available, and may also require the building owner to pay a deposit to guarantee the documents' return.

[66 FR 7583, Jan. 24, 2001, as amended at 83 FR 31677, July 9, 2018]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1987 · leading case: United States v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983). “, 47 C.F.R. § 68.110 . 193 . Should AT & T misuse its patents — for example by improperly refusing to license them — the aggrieved parties would be free to pursue their remedies under the patent and antitrust laws: there is nothing in the decree to diminish any of these rights…”

United States v. W. Elec. Co., Inc., 673 F. Supp. 525 (D.D.C. 1987). “2d at 82; see also 47 C.F.R. § 68.110 (b) (1985). 245 . The weakening changes of the disclosure requirement have been adopted predominantly for the Regional Companies’ marketing of CPE, matters addressed in CC Docket No.”

Interconnect Plan. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 465 F. Supp. 811 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “Such equipment, registered as provided in these regulations, may now be plugged directly into the system, and equipment that has not been so registered may be connected through a protective device; moreover, the telephone company must provide, to anyone who requests it, whatever…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.