47 C.F.R. § 76.702

Public access

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A cable operator may refuse to transmit any public access program or portion of a public access program that the operator reasonably believes contains obscenity.

[62 FR 28373, May 23, 1997]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1993–1996 · leading case: Denver Area Educ. Telecomm. Consortium, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 518 U.S. 727 (1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Denver Area Educ. Telecomm. Consortium, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 518 U.S. 727 (1996). · cites it 6× “See 47 CFR § 76.702 (1995) (incorporating definition from § 76.”

All. for Cmty. Media v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 10 F.3d 812 (D.C. Cir. 1993). · cites it 3× “19,623, 19,626 (1993) (to be codified at 47 C.F.R. § 76.702 ). The regulations have been stayed pending review, and the petitions for review have been expedited and consolidated.”

Altmann v. Television Signal Corp., 849 F. Supp. 1335 (N.D. Cal. 1994). · cites it 2× “19,623 (1993) (to be codified at 47 C.F.R. § 76.702 ). Plaintiffs claim that all three sections and their implementing regulations violate the First Amendment and therefore Viacom has no statutory basis for its policies.”

All. for Cmty. Media v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 56 F.3d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1995). · cites it 3× “19,623,19,626 (1993) (to be codified at 47 C.F.R. § 76.702 ). The regulations permitted cable operators to require PEG access programmers to certify that their programming contains no material in these categories.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.