47 C.F.R. § 76.906
Presumption of effective competition
In the absence of a demonstration to the contrary cable systems are presumed: (a) To be subject to effective competition pursuant to section 76.905(b)(2); and (b) Not to be subject to effective competition pursuant to section 76.905(b)(1), (3) or (4).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2022 · leading case: Adelphia Commc'ns Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 88 F.3d 1250 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
Adelphia Commc'ns Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 88 F.3d 1250 (D.C. Cir. 1996). “§ 543 (0(1) (defining “effective competition”); 47 C.F.R. § 76.906 (lack of effective competition presumed).”
Spectrum Ne., LLC v. Frey, 22 F.4th 287 (1st Cir. 2022). “Recently, Maine, a state that has effective competition, see 47 C.F.R. § 76.906 (2020), enacted a statute that requires cable operators to grant subscribers, if they cancel their cable service three or more days prior to the end of a billing period, pro rata credits or rebates…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.