47 C.F.R. § 90.615

Individual channels available in the General Category in 806-824/851-869 MHz band

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Category will consist of channels 231-260a and 511-550 at locations farther than 110 km (68.4 miles) from the U.S./Mexico border and 140 km (87 miles) from the U.S./Canadian border. All entities will be eligible for licensing on these channels except as described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.

(a) In a given 800 MHz NPSPAC region, any channel in the 231-260 range which is vacated by a licensee relocating to channels 551-830 and which remains vacant after band reconfiguration will be available as follows:

(1) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety Category until three years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;

(2) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety or Critical Infrastructure Industry Categories from three to five years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;

(3) To all entities five years after release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region.

(b) In a given 800 MHz NPSPAC region, any channel in the 231-260 range which is vacated by a licensee relocating to channels 511-550 and remains vacant after band reconfiguration will be available as follows:

(1) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety Category until three years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;

(2) Only to eligible applicants in the Public Safety or Critical Infrastructure Industry Categories from three to five years after the release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region;

(3) To all entities five years after release of a public notice announcing the completion of band reconfiguration in that region.

(c) Spectrum Block F1 consists of channels 236-260.

(d) [Reserved]

[70 FR 6759, Feb. 8, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 76708, Dec. 28, 2005; 83 FR 61100, Nov. 27, 2018; 90 FR 57711, Dec. 12, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2005 · leading case: Keller Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 130 F.3d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
Keller Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 130 F.3d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “47 C.F.R. § 90.615 (b)(2)(ii) (1992). To accomplish this, the rules required Lewisville to submit its application to a “frequency coordinator” who, after checking the Commission’s database, would either certify that no one else had a license to use Flower Mound’s channel or…”
Kay v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 393 F.3d 1339 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “See 47 C.F.R. § 90.615 (b)(2)(h) (1992 version).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.