48 C.F.R. § 13.106
13.106 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers, award and documentation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1999–2018 · leading case: Dubinsky v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 243 (Fed. Cl. 1999).
Dubinsky v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 243 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “” 48 C.F.R. § 13.106 — 2(b)(1). Contracting officers, however, must utilize an “appropriate combination of the procedures in parts 12, 13, 14, and 15.”
Forestry Surveys & Data v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 493 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “Second, the simplified procedures allow the eval *499 uation of past performance to be based on “the contracting officer’s knowledge of and previous experience with the supply or service being acquired____” 48 C.F.R. § 13.106 — 2(b)(2)(ii). Thus, the Forest Service not only had…”
Land Shark Shredding, LLC v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2018). “48 C.F.R. § 13.106-3 (a)(1); see Pl. Mot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.