(a) The contracting officer shall determine that a prospective contractor is responsible (see subpart 9.1) and that the prices offered are reasonable before awarding the contract. The price analysis techniques in 15.404-1(b) may be used as guidelines. In each case the determination shall be made in the light of all prevailing circumstances. Particular care must be taken in cases where only a single bid is received.
(b) The price analysis shall consider whether bids are materially unbalanced (see 15.404-1(g)).
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 25527, June 21, 1990. Redesignated at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 51270, Sept. 30, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
First Enter. v. United States, 61 Fed. Cl. 109 (Fed. Cl. 2004).
· cites it 2× “15 48 C.F.R. §§ 14.408-2 ,15.402(a). When, such as in this case, neither a statute nor any applicable FAR requires the submission of cost or pricing data by offerors, the contracting officer must determine whether prices are fair by using the following order of preference: (1)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.