48 C.F.R. § 17.101

17.101 Authority.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart implements 41 U.S.C. 3903 and 10 U.S.C. 3501 and provides policy and procedures for the use of multi-year contracting.

[79 FR 24202, Apr. 29, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 73898, Dec. 1, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Gov't Sys. Advisors, Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl. Ct. 470 (Ct. Cl. 1987).
Gov't Sys. Advisors, Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl. Ct. 470 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “Because funds were appropriated in Varo, the court found that the government was required to exercise the option or terminate for the convenience of the government. Plaintiff has not established that the contract at bar was a multiyear requirements contract that satisfied the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.