48 C.F.R. § 31.205

31.205 Selected costs.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2021 · leading case: Meridian Eng'g Co. v. United States, 122 Fed. Cl. 381 (Fed. Cl. 2015).
Meridian Eng'g Co. v. United States, 122 Fed. Cl. 381 (Fed. Cl. 2015). · cites it 3× “]” 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 33(b); see also 48 C.”
Les Brownlee, Acting Sec'y of the Army v. Dyncorp, 349 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 47(b) (1991) (emphasis added).”
Sab Constr., Inc. v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 77 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “The government argues that the plaintiff’s consultant costs are unallowable under 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 ^47(f)(l), which states that the costs of legal services and the services of consultants are “unallowable if incurred in connection with .”
White Buffalo Constr., Inc. v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 36(b)(3) (2001); see also Neal & Co.”
Gen. Motors Corp. v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 153 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “” 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 6(j)(2)(i). These provisions dictate certain obligations that bind the contractor when allocating or funding pension costs for a given year.”
Richlin Sec. Serv. Co. v. Michael Chertoff, Sec'y of Homeland Sec., 437 F.3d 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “(4) Price revision of fixed-price incentive contracts”); 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 6(h)(1) (2003) (backpay is a form of "compensation for personal services” constituting "a retroactive adjustment of prior years’ salaries or wages,” and is "unallowable except [that] [p]ayments to…”
Info. Sys. & Network Corp. v. United States, 437 F.3d 1173 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “Many of these limitations are enumerated in 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 and include rules for determining the allowability of forty-seven different types of costs.”
Thermalon Indus., Ltd. v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 464 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “Miller's amended 1991 tax return, if not actual tax fraud, is directly contrary to the policy underlying 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 6(b)(2)(i).” Def.’s Br.”
ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 612 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 -ll(b). The court is not persuaded by the Government’s argument that CAS 404 and CAS 409 are applicable only to the extent that the disputed Production Costs satisfy FAR 31.”
United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., the Shipbuilders Council of Am., Amicus Curiae, 862 F.2d 464 (4th Cir. 1988). “205, 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 (1987) (“Selected Costs”).”
DIRECTV Grp., Inc. v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 302 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “216-7 (1998), and the Taxation clause, 48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 41(d) (1996). DIRECTV argues in response that the government’s reading of the Credits clause is not correct.”
Raytheon Co. v. United States, 92 Fed. Cl. 549 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “48 C.F.R. § 31.205 — 6(o)(5) (2005). 19 DISCUSSION I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.