49 C.F.R. § 1100.2
Applicability
The rules in parts 1100-1129, Rules of General Applicability, establish general rules applicable to all types of proceedings. Other rules in this subchapter establish special rules applicable to particular types of proceedings. When there is a conflict or inconsistency between a rule of general applicability and a special rule, the special rule will govern.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1980–1987 · leading case: People of the State of Illinois & Bi-Petro Refining Co., Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 698 F.2d 868 (7th Cir. 1983).
People of the State of Illinois & Bi-Petro Refining Co., Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 698 F.2d 868 (7th Cir. 1983). “49 C.F.R. § 1100.2 (1981). Bridge traffic information is clearly relevant to the I.”
Consol. Rail Corp. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1444 (3rd Cir. 1987). “] proceedings,” 49 C.F.R. § 1100.2 (1986), and are to be “construed liberally to secure just, speedy and inexpensive determination of the issues presented.”
Georgia-Florida-Alabama Transp. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 614 F.2d 1078 (5th Cir. 1980). “The ICC’s Rules of Practice provide that procedural rules will be liberally construed, 49 C.F.R. § 1100.2 , and that parties may seek relief in circumstances not covered by the Rules by filing a petition stating the reasons, for relief, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.