C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER I—PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER C—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REGULATIONS › PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND PACKAGINGS › Subpart B—Preparation of Hazardous Materials for Transportation

49 C.F.R. § 173.34

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2001 · leading case: Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc., 29 P.3d 838 (Alaska 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc., 29 P.3d 838 (Alaska 2001). · cites it 9× “Because the duty to warn imposed by the court's opinion is ill-defined and not supported by authority, I dissent from the court's holding that evidence of Shoreside's tank-filling practices was admissible as relevant to a duty to warn on Shoreside's part.”
Hurt v. Coyne Cylinder Co., 956 F.2d 1319 (6th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “, 49 C.F.R. § 173.34 , they therefore are meant to apply to consumer use.”
Carib Gas Corp. v. Delaware Valley Indus. Gases, Inc., 660 F. Supp. 419 (D.V.I. 1987). “See 49 C.F.R. 173.34. Compliance is monitored by independent inspection agencies licensed by the D.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 173.34(a)(1) — 1 case
Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc., 29 P.3d 838 (Alaska 2001). “Because the duty to warn imposed by the court's opinion is ill-defined and not supported by authority, I dissent from the court's holding that evidence of Shoreside's tank-filling practices was admissible as relevant to a duty to warn on Shoreside's part.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.