49 C.F.R. § 192.457

External corrosion control: Buried or submerged pipelines installed before August 1, 1971

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except for buried piping at compressor, regulator, and measuring stations, each buried or submerged transmission line installed before August 1, 1971, that has an effective external coating must be cathodically protected along the entire area that is effectively coated, in accordance with this subpart. For the purposes of this subpart, a pipeline does not have an effective external coating if its cathodic protection current requirements are substantially the same as if it were bare. The operator shall make tests to determine the cathodic protection current requirements.

(b) Except for cast iron or ductile iron, each of the following buried or submerged pipelines installed before August 1, 1971, must be cathodically protected in accordance with this subpart in areas in which active corrosion is found:

(1) Bare or ineffectively coated transmission lines.

(2) Bare or coated pipes at compressor, regulator, and measuring stations.

(3) Bare or coated distribution lines.

[Amdt. 192-4, 36 FR 12302, June 30, 1971, as amended by Amdt. 192-33, 43 FR 39390, Sept. 5, 1978; Amdt. 192-93, 68 FR 53900, Sept. 15, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1993 · leading case: Dudley v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., 632 A.2d 492 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1993).
Dudley v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., 632 A.2d 492 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to this authority, the Secretary promulgated 49 C.F.R. § 192.457 , which establishes “external corrosion control” standards for pipelines that, like those at issue here, were installed before August 1, 1971.”
Karle v. Nat'l Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 448 F. Supp. 753 (W.D. Pa. 1978). “Utility companies are required by 49 C.F.R. § 192.457 (b), 36 Fed.Reg. 12,302 [1971] to cathodieally protect underground steel pipelines installed before August 1, 1971 in areas where active corrosion is found.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.