(a) After the designated railroad police officer is commissioned by a state or states, the railroad shall send, by certified mail, written notice to appropriate officials of every other state in which the railroad police officer shall protect the railroad's property, personnel, passengers, and cargo. The notice of commission shall contain the following information:
(1) The name of the railroad police officer;
(2) The badge number, identification number, rank, code, or other identifying information assigned to the railroad police officer;
(3) The date of commission;
(4) The state or states where the railroad police officer is commissioned;
(5) The date the railroad police officer received training or retraining regarding the laws of such state or states;
(6) The name of the railroad official who designated the employee as a railroad police officer; and
(7) Color photographs of the types of badges, identification cards, and other identifying materials the railroad uses to identify its railroad police officers.
(b) The railroad shall keep copies of all such notices at a central location.
(c) The authority set forth in § 207.5 shall be effective upon receipt by such state(s) of written notice conforming to the requirements of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Brannaker v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., 428 S.W.2d 524 (Mo. 1968).
· cites it 5× “Consistent with the federal statutes, the Interstate Commerce Commission adopted regulations, 49 CFR 207.4, providing that authorized carriers may perform authorized transportation in or with equipment which they do not own under these, among other, conditions: the lease must be…”
Mellon Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., of the Est. of Jacob Casale, Deceased, as Interveners, Hardware Dealers Mut. Ins. Co., Phoenix Ins. Co., Old Colony Ins. Co., Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Hartford Fire Ins. Co., N. Ins. Co., Nw. Nat'l Ins. Co., St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., & the Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp.. Emily Peternal & Joseph Peternal, Her Husband v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., & the Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp.. Kenneth F. Fries & Janice A. Fries, His Wife, & Kenneth F. Fries, Trading & Doing Bus. as Fries Elec. & Hardware, & Hardware Dealers Mut. Ins. Co., a Corp. v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., & the Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp.. Belva Ross & J. William Ross, Her Husband v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., & the Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp.. J. William Ross, Adm'r of the Est. of Cheryl Faye Ross, Deceased v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., & the Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp.. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., Edmund Whiteman, Adm'r of the Est. of Dora Whiteman, Deceased v. Sophie Lines, Inc., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., & the Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp., Turner Transfer, Inc., a Corp., 289 F.2d 473 (3rd Cir. 1961).
“MC-43, 49 C.F.R. 207.4 et seq., contained the following: 4 "It is understood that the leased equipment under this Agreement is in the exclusive possession, control and use of the authorized carrier Lessee and that the Lessee assumes full responsibility in respect to the…”
Consol. Sys., Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 411 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1969).
“Much is said in the briefs about Alterman’s being required by ICC regulations, 49 C.F.R. § 207.4 (4), to assume full legal responsibility for any vehicle under lease to it.”
Wirtz v. Dependable Trucking Co., 260 F. Supp. 240 (D.N.J. 1966).
“, under its safety program to include such persons as may be connected to the safety of equipment, but who are not in fact employees of interstate carriers.”
Mellon Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Sophie Lines, Inc., 289 F.2d 473 (3rd Cir. 1961).
“MC-43, 49 C.F.R. 207.4 et seq., contained the following: “It is understood that the leased equipment under this Agreement is in the exclusive possession, control and use of the authorized carrier Lessee and that the Lessee assumes full responsibility in respect to the equipment…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc., 389 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1968).
“We dismissed Deaton’s petition because it was not an aggrieved party and denied the union’s petition because the union had erroneously included in the bargaining unit multiple owner-drivers who the Board had properly held to be supervisors.”
Kirkwood v. Sikorski, 115 N.W.2d 32 (Minn. 1962).
“(2d) 212, 216 , in construing the Interstate Commerce Commission regulation involved, 49 CFR, § 207.4 , we noted: “* * * there is nothing in the regulation which attempts to define employer-employee relationship for workmen’s compensation act purposes or suggests that the…”
— 49 C.F.R. § 207.4(a) — 1 case
Brannaker v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., 428 S.W.2d 524 (Mo. 1968).
“Consistent with the federal statutes, the Interstate Commerce Commission adopted regulations, 49 CFR 207.4, providing that authorized carriers may perform authorized transportation in or with equipment which they do not own under these, among other, conditions: the lease must be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.