49 C.F.R. § 213.55

Track alinement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, alinement may not deviate from uniformity more than the amount prescribed in the following table:

Class of trackTangent trackCurved track
The deviation of the mid-offset from a 62-foot line 1 may not be more than—(inches)The deviation of the mid-ordinate from a 31-foot chord 2 may not be more than—(inches)The deviation of the mid-ordinate from a 62-foot chord 2 may not be more than—(inches)
Class 1 track53 N/A5
Class 2 track33 N/A3
Class 3 track134114134
Class 4 track1121112
Class 5 track341258
1 The ends of the line shall be at points on the gage side of the line rail, five-eighths of an inch below the top of the railhead. Either rail may be used as the line rail; however, the same rail shall be used for the full length of that tangential segment of the track.
2 The ends of the chord shall be at points on the gage side of the outer rail, five-eighths of an inch below the top of the railhead.
3 N/A—Not Applicable

(b) For operations at a qualified cant deficiency, Eu, of more than 5 inches, the alinement of the outside rail of the curve may not deviate from uniformity more than the amount prescribed in the following table:

Class of trackCurved track
The deviation of the mid-ordinate from a 31-foot chord 1 may not be more than—(inches)The deviation of the mid-ordinate from a 62-foot chord 1 may not be more than—(inches)
Class 1 track 23 N/A114
Class 2 track 23 N/A114
Class 3 track34114
Class 4 track3478
Class 5 track1258
1 The ends of the chord shall be at points on the gage side of the outer rail, five-eighths of an inch below the top of the railhead.
2 Restraining rails or other systems may be required for derailment prevention.
3 N/A—Not Applicable
[78 FR 16100, Mar. 13, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2019 · leading case: CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Sebree, 924 F.3d 276 (6th Cir. 2019).
CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Sebree, 924 F.3d 276 (6th Cir. 2019). “63 (regulating track surface); 49 C.F.R. § 213.55 (providing track alinement may not deviate from uniformity more than prescribed amounts).”
Cowden v. BNSF Ry. Co., 975 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (E.D. Mo. 2013). “Defendant also notes — and Plaintiff admits — Plaintiff has never alleged any violation of 49 C.F.R. § 213.55 , which pertains to track alinement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.