49 C.F.R. § 350.101

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to provide direction for entities seeking MCSAP or High Priority Program funding to improve motor carrier, CMV, and driver safety.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2013–2023 · leading case: Klint L. Mowrer v. DOT, 14 F.4th 723 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
Klint L. Mowrer v. DOT, 14 F.4th 723 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “§ 31102 ; 49 C.F.R. § 350.101 et seq. The agency also uses the information to guide enforcement actions, see 65 Fed.”
United States v. Victor Orozco, 858 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2017). “” 49 C.F.R. § 350.101 (a). Nevada’s CVSP provides that the Nevada Highway Patrol’s “enforcement activities” will include “scheduled and unannounced roadside inspections.”
Owner Operator Ind. Drivers Assn., Inc. v. Karas, 2020 NY Slip Op 06319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). “The FMCSA enforces its regulations in partnership with states participating in the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program, through which states receive grant funding in exchange for adopting FMCSA regulations into state law and assisting in their enforcement ( see 49 USC §…”
State of Indiana & Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehs. v. Nicholas Hargrave, 51 N.E.3d 255 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “49 C.F.R. §350.101 . The General Assembly has amended Indiana Code section 9-24-6-2 several times over the years to ensure that the BMV complies with the specific federal statutes and regulations governing CDLs.”
Zei v. Maryland Transit Admin., 71 A.3d 1 (Md. 2013). “49 C.F.R. § 350.101 . . All of the out-of-state cases which Zei relies on — for the proposition that MTA was required to conduct an individualized assessment of Zei and thus judgement as a matter of law is inappropriate — fail to consider this combination of the legislative…”
Matter of Owner Operator Ind. Drivers Assn., Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Transp., 2022 NY Slip Op 02166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “To encourage state cooperation in the enforcement of those federal regulations, the FMCSA provides grant funding to states that adopt the regulations into state law and assist in their enforcement ( see 49 USC § 31102 ; 49 CFR 350.101, 350.209, 350.211). New York is a…”
United States v. Victor Orozco (9th Cir. 2017). “” 49 C.F.R. § 350.101 (a). Nevada’s CVSP provides that the Nevada Highway Patrol’s “enforcement activities” will include “scheduled and unannounced roadside inspections.”
Parker v. New Jersey Motor Veh. Comm'n (D.N.J. 2023). “” 49 C.F.R. § 350.101 (a) and 49 U.S.C. § 31102 .”
Talcott v. Barr-Nunn Transp., Inc. (M.D. Penn. 2021). “As such, the Defendant argues, specifically as it relates to the Plaintiff’s claim for disability discrimination, that the Plaintiff, due to his unconsciousness, was no longer qualified to perform his duties as a driver as “he could not operate a commercial motor vehicle under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.