C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER B—FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS › PART 382—CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL USE AND TESTING › Subpart A—General

49 C.F.R. § 382.121

Employee admission of alcohol and controlled substances use

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Employees who admit to alcohol misuse or controlled substances use are not subject to the referral, evaluation and treatment requirements of this part and part 40 of this title, provided that:

(1) The admission is in accordance with a written employer-established voluntary self-identification program or policy that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section;

(2) The driver does not self-identify in order to avoid testing under the requirements of this part;

(3) The driver makes the admission of alcohol misuse or controlled substances use prior to performing a safety sensitive function (i.e., prior to reporting for duty); and

(4) The driver does not perform a safety sensitive function until the employer is satisfied that the employee has been evaluated and has successfully completed education or treatment requirements in accordance with the self-identification program guidelines.

(b) A qualified voluntary self-identification program or policy must contain the following elements:

(1) It must prohibit the employer from taking adverse action against an employee making a voluntary admission of alcohol misuse or controlled substances use within the parameters of the program or policy and paragraph (a) of this section;

(2) It must allow the employee sufficient opportunity to seek evaluation, education or treatment to establish control over the employee's drug or alcohol problem;

(3) It must permit the employee to return to safety sensitive duties only upon successful completion of an educational or treatment program, as determined by a drug and alcohol abuse evaluation expert, i.e., employee assistance professional, substance abuse professional, or qualified drug and alcohol counselor;

(4) It must ensure that:

(i) Prior to the employee participating in a safety sensitive function, the employee shall undergo a non-DOT return to duty test with a result indicating an alcohol concentration of less than 0.02; and/or

(ii) Prior to the employee participating in a safety sensitive function, the employee shall undergo a non-DOT return to duty controlled substance test with a verified negative test result for controlled substances use; and

(5) It may incorporate employee monitoring and include non-DOT follow-up testing.

[66 FR 43103, Aug. 17, 2001, as amended at 86 FR 35639, July 7, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2022 · leading case: Jackson v. JB Hunt Transp., Inc., 384 S.W.3d 177 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackson v. JB Hunt Transp., Inc., 384 S.W.3d 177 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “§ 31306 (e), (f) ( 49 C.F.R. § 382.121 was promulgated under authority of these statutes.”
Roscoe Tinkle v. Dep't of Agric., No. DA-0752-14-0377-I-2 (MSPB Oct. 17, 2022). · cites it 2× “He alleged that the agency violated 49 C.F.R. § 382.121 (b)(3) by prematurely ordering his return to safety-sensitive duties and requiring that he undergo the drug test underlying his removal, without proper certification by his drug counselor.”
Eddie Wyatt v. J. B. Hunt Transp., 366 F. App'x 718 (8th Cir. 2010). “§§ 12101-12213 , and Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations, 49 C.F.R. § 382.121 . After careful de novo review, we find no error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.