49 C.F.R. § 396.1

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Every motor carrier, its officers, drivers, agents, representatives, and employees directly concerned with the inspection or maintenance of commercial motor vehicles must be knowledgeable of and comply with the rules of this part.

(b) Every intermodal equipment provider, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees directly concerned with the inspection or maintenance of intermodal equipment interchanged or offered for interchange to motor carriers must be knowledgeable of and comply with the rules of this part.

(c) This part does not apply to “covered farm vehicles,” as defined in 49 CFR 390.5, or to the drivers of such vehicles.

(d) The rules in this part do not apply to “pipeline welding trucks” as defined in 49 CFR 390.38(b).

[73 FR 76823, Dec. 17, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 16195, Mar. 14, 2013; 81 FR 47722, July 22, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: Serna v. Pettey Leach Trucking, Inc., 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6866 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003).
Serna v. Pettey Leach Trucking, Inc., 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6866 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003). “), inspection, repair and maintenance ( 49 C.F.R. § 396.1 et seq.), and more. 4 According to Serna, PLT acted as a motor carrier pursuant to a grant of public authority, and Sky was its subhauler or subcontractor; hence, claims Serna, PLT is vicariously liable for Sky’s…”
McCauley v. Commonwealth, 435 S.E.2d 891 (Va. Ct. App. 1993). “4 and the federal regulations of the Motor Carrier Safety Act which have been adopted in Virginia require that motor carrier drivers be familiar with the inspection, repair and maintenance regulations, 49 C.F.R. 396.1, and authorize specially trained State Police officers, such…”
McCauley v. Com., 435 S.E.2d 891 (Va. Ct. App. 1993). “4 and the federal regulations of the Motor Carrier Safety Act which have been adopted in Virginia require that motor carrier drivers be familiar with the inspection, repair and maintenance regulations, 49 C.F.R. 396.1, and authorize specially trained State Police officers, such…”
Aziz M. Thabo Vs. Z Transp.(l-3296-15, Passaic Cnty. & Statewide) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017). “Plaintiff sent defendant a check in the 1 See 49 C.F.R. 396.1 to -396.25. 3 A-0034-16T1 amount of $18,600, representing the balance of the purchase price.”
Tona v. Coca-Cola Beverages Ne., Inc. (D. Conn. 2023). “Tona alleges that, pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 396.1 , Coca-Cola drivers based in Naugatuck are exempt from DOT service hours; see id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.