C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER V—NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › PART 552—PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING, DEFECT, AND NONCOMPLIANCE ORDERS › Subpart A—General

49 C.F.R. § 552.6

Technical review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The appropriate Associate Administrator conducts a technical review of the petition. The technical review may consist of an analysis of the material submitted, together with information already in the possession of the agency. It may also include the collection of additional information, or a public meeting in accordance with § 552.7.

[60 FR 17267, Apr. 5, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2020 · leading case: Ctr. for Auto Saf. v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Sec'y, Dep't of Transp., 828 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ctr. for Auto Saf. v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Sec'y, Dep't of Transp., 828 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “The “reasonable possibility” standard of NHTSA’s own regulations clearly requires NHTSA to make a factual judgment about the chances that a safety-related defect exists, based on the evidence compiled during the “technical review” prescribed by 49 C.F.R. § 552.6 . This kind of…”
Ctr. for Auto Saf. v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Sec'y, Dep't of Transp., 846 F.2d 1532 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “” 49 C.F.R. §§ 552.6 and 552.8 (1987). The case was originally decided by a sharply divided panel.”
Thompson v. Nat'l High. Traffic Saf. Admin., No. 2019-1795 (D.D.C. Dec. 18, 2020). “” 49 C.F.R. § 552.6 . “After considering the technical review” and “taking into account appropriate factors, which may include, among others, allocation of agency resources, agency priorities and the likelihood of success in litigation which might arise from the order,” NHTSA…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.