5 C.F.R. § 1200.1
Statement of purpose
The Merit Systems Protection Board (the Board) is an independent Government agency that operates like a court. The Board was created to ensure that all Federal government agencies follow Federal merit systems practices. The Board does this by adjudicating Federal employee appeals of agency personnel actions, and by conducting special reviews and studies of Federal merit systems.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Steven Crowe v. Christine Wormuth, 74 F.4th 1011 (9th Cir. 2023).
Steven Crowe v. Christine Wormuth, 74 F.4th 1011 (9th Cir. 2023). “” 5 C.F.R. § 1200.1 . But the MSPB’s jurisdiction is reserved for the more significant adverse employment actions.”
Sloan v. West, 140 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir. 1998). “; see also, 5 C.F.R. § 1200.1 (1997). The MSPB is charged with overseeing and protecting the merit system, and adjudicating conflicts between Federal employees and employers.”
Augustine v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 429 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “” 5 C.F.R. § 1200.1 (2004). California has no authority to require that attorneys practicing before the Board obtain a state license or to regulate the award of fees for work before federal agencies.”
Berry v. United States, 86 Fed. Cl. 750 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “…any provision within § 531.406 that it could reasonably construe as money-mandating. . See 5 U.S.C. §§ 1204 , 7701; 5 C.F.R. §§ 1200.1 , .3. . 5 U.S.C. § 7503 (b)(4) provides that "[a]n employee against whom a suspension for 14 days or less is proposed is entitled to ... a…”
Berry v. United States, 86 Fed. Cl. 24 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “See 5 C.F.R. § 1200.1 . . Federal employees may obtain judicial review of a MSPB final decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.”
Holland v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 51 F. Supp. 3d 1357 (N.D. Ga. 2014). “5 C.F.R. § 1200.1 ,1201.3. MSPB review of adverse employment actions was designed to protect federal employees from widespread politically motivated terminations whenever the party in power changed hands.”
James v. Levinson, 680 F. Supp. 187 (E.D. Pa. 1988). “and 5 C.F.R. §§ 1200.1 , et seq. Plaintiffs complaint, para.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 944 F.2d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “Plan, supra note 25, §§ 201-202, 204, 5 C.F.R. §§ 1200.1 -.201.183 (1991); 5 U.”
Akerman v. Garduno (D. Nev. 2024). “See 5 C.F.R. § 1200.1 (The MSPB is “an independent Government agency that 15 operates like a court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.