5 C.F.R. § 1201.175

Judicial review of cases decided under 5 U.S.C. 7702

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Place and type of review. The appropriate United States district court is authorized to conduct all judicial review of cases decided under 5 U.S.C. 7702. Those cases include appeals from actions taken under the following provisions: Section 717(c) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)); section 15(c) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended (29 U.S.C. 633a(c)); and section 15(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 216(b)).

(b) Time for filing request. Regardless of any other provision of law, requests for judicial review of all cases decided under 5 U.S.C. 7702 must be filed within 30 days after the appellant received notice of the judicially reviewable action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Johnnetta Punch v. Jim Bridenstine, 945 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019).
Johnnetta Punch v. Jim Bridenstine, 945 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019). “§ 7703 (b)(2); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 ; 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310 (b).”
Darlene BUTLER, Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Sec'y, Dep't of the Army, Appellee, 164 F.3d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “§ 7703 (b), 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 , 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310 (b).”
Sloan v. West, 140 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir. 1998). “§ 7703 (b)(2); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 (1997). This appeal of the MSPB or EEOC final determination must be filed in district court within 30 days.”
Stoll v. Principi, 449 F.3d 263 (1st Cir. 2006). “See 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 . In either event, however, the complainant must wait until the Board takes final action before seeking judicial review.”
Nater v. Riley, 114 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.P.R. 2000). “§ 7703 (b)(2); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 . A final decision by the MSPB in a mixed case appeal may then be appealed to a United States District Court.”
Williams v. Court Servs. & Offender Supervision Agency, 772 F. Supp. 2d 186 (D.D.C. 2011). “§ 7703 (b); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 ; 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310 (b)).”
Munene v. McAleenan (D. Ariz. 2023). · cites it 2× “§§ 18 7702, 7703(a)(1), (b)(2); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 ; 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310 (b).”
Hardyway v. McDonough (M.D. Tenn. 2022). “§ 7703 (b), 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 , 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310 (b).”
Sanchez v. Duke (W.D. Wash. 2019). “§ 7703 (b)(2); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 ; 12 see also Sloan v.”
Ganoe (M.D. Penn. 2026). “§ 7703(b), 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175, 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310(b).”
Williams v. Court Servs. & Offender Supervision Agency for Dc (D.D.C. 2011). “§ 7703 (b); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.175 ; 29 C.F.R. § 1614.310 (b)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.