C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER XIV—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL › SUBCHAPTER C—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY › PART 2423—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE PROCEEDINGS › Subpart A—Filing, Investigating, Resolving, and Acting on Charges

5 C.F.R. § 2423.5

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1985–1990 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 834 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 834 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1987). · cites it 12× “EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: In July 1985, the National Labor Relations Board Union (the “Union”) petitioned the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the “FLRA”) to amend 5 C.F.R. §§ 2423.5 and 2424.5 (1987). 1 The Union claimed that these regulations were inconsistent with 5 U.”
Montana Air Chapter No. 29, Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 898 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1990). · cites it 6× “5 C.F.R. § 2423.5 . Here, the union chose to pursue only the unfair labor practice procedure.”
Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., Washington, D.C., Local 32, Afge, Afl-Cio, Intervenor, 778 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “5 C.F.R. § 2423.5 (1985). 11 . Compare 5 U.”
Def. Logistics Agency v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 754 F.2d 1003 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “5 of the Authority’s regulations, 5 C.F.R. § 2423.5 (1984), provides, in part: Where a labor organization files an unfair labor practice charge pursuant to this part which involves a negotiability issue, and the labor organization also files pursuant to Part 2424 of this…”
Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 789 F.2d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “Or, since the union has the right to appeal a question of negotiability directly to the Authority (but must choose between pursuing such a direct appeal or filing an unfair labor practice charge with the General Counsel, see 5 C.F.R. §§ 2423.5 , 2424.5), he may have concluded…”
U.S. Army Eng'r Ctr. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 762 F.2d 409 (4th Cir. 1985). · cites it 2× “The Authority has held, pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2423.5 (1985), that it may make the compelling need determination in a ULP proceeding where an agency has by regulation unilaterally acted to change existing conditions of employment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.