C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER XIV—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL › SUBCHAPTER C—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY › PART 2424—NEGOTIABILITY PROCEEDINGS › Subpart A—Applicability of This Part and Definitions

5 C.F.R. § 2424.1

Applicability of this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part applies to all petitions for review filed on or after August 29, 2025.

[90 FR 42132, Aug. 29, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–1990 · leading case: Library of Cong. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 699 F.2d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Library of Cong. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 699 F.2d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “The obligation to negotiate also does not extend to: (1) matters relating to prohibited political activities, see § 7103(a)(14)(A); (2) matters relating to the classification of any position, see § 7103(a)(14)(B); (3) proposals that are inconsistent with any federal law or…”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 778 F.2d 850 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “” § 7117(c)(6); see generally 5 C.F.R. §§ 2424.1 -.10 (1983); H. Robinson, Negotiability in the Federal Sector 185-88 (1981).”
Montana Air Chapter No. 29, Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 898 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1990). “A labor organization may appeal the agency’s decision through the negotiability appeal process established in § 7117(c) and 5 C.F.R. §§ 2424.1 et seq., or the organization may request that the General Counsel issue an unfair labor practice complaint against the agency pursuant…”
Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 789 F.2d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “See 5 C.F.R. § 2424.1 (1985). *946 Thus, if the Authority determines that an Impasses Panel’s provision was neither contrary to applicable external law nor contrary to an agency rule for which there is a compelling need, the agency head will have refused to negotiate on a…”
U.S. Army Eng'r Ctr. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 762 F.2d 409 (4th Cir. 1985). · cites it 2× “The Authority, however, has prescribed the same procedures for both, § 7117(b) and (c), see 5 C.F.R. § 2424.1 , except for 5 C.F.R. § 2424.”
Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Gov't Employees, Local R4-68, 802 F.2d 1484 (4th Cir. 1986). “Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command, Harry Diamond Laboratories, 11 FLRA 359 (1983) that a written notice of disapproval constituted an allegation of nonnegotiability so as to give rise to the right of Agency review of negotiability as provided in 5 C.F.R. §§ 2424.1…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.