5 C.F.R. § 250.103

Consequences of improper agency actions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If OPM finds that an agency has taken an action contrary to a law, rule, regulation, or standard that OPM administers, OPM may require the agency to take corrective action. OPM may suspend or revoke a delegation agreement established under § 250.102 at any time if it determines that the agency is not adhering to the provisions of the agreement. OPM may suspend or withdraw any authority granted under this chapter to an agency, including any authority granted by delegation agreement, when OPM finds that the agency has not complied with qualification standards OPM has issued, instructions OPM has published, or the regulations in this chapter. OPM also may suspend or withdraw these authorities when it determines that doing so is in the interest of the civil service for any other reason.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2020 · leading case: Honea v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 524 F. App'x 623 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Honea v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 524 F. App'x 623 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “101 , those regulations do not mandate a finding of Board jurisdiction due to a failure to adhere to the GPPA, 5 C.F.R. § 250.103 (Failing to adhere to the GPPA can result in an order from OPM requiring the agency take corrective action.”

Avalos v. Hud (Fed. Cir. 2020). “at 5 (citing 5 C.F.R. § 250.103 ). He then held that, because of this regulatory authority, the Board could not review OPM’s “corrective action” directing HUD to “regularize” Mr.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.