C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 316—TEMPORARY AND TERM EMPLOYMENT › Subpart C—Term Employment

5 C.F.R. § 316.303

Tenure of term employees

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A term employee does not acquire a competitive status on the basis of his term appointment.

(b) The employment of a term employee ends automatically on the expiration of his term appointment unless he has been separated earlier in accordance with this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Adria Gharati v. Dep't of the Army, 2022 MSPB 16 (MSPB 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adria Gharati v. Dep't of the Army, 2022 MSPB 16 (MSPB 2022). “198 , 199 (1980); 5 C.F.R. § 316.303 (b). Here, the initial decision was issued on April 21, 2016, the appellant’s term appointment expired on the predetermined date of May 20, 2016, and the initial decision became final on May 26, 2016—6 days after her term appointment expired.”
Hondros v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n, 720 F.2d 278 (3rd Cir. 1983). “See 5 C.F.R. § 316.303 (a) (1983) (“[a] term employee does not acquire a competitive status on the basis of his term appointment”).”
Andrew C. Eller, Jr. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 2014 MSPB 72 (MSPB 2014). “” 5 C.F.R. § 316.303 (b). Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the appellant began serving in his term position effective January 12, 2005, and he would have served in that position through and including January 11, 2009.”
Andrew C. Eller, Jr. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 2014 MSPB 72 (MSPB 2014). “” 5 C.F.R. § 316.303 (b). Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the appellant began serving in his term position effective January 12, 2005, and he would have served in that position through and including January 11, 2009.”
Kevin A. Williams v. Fed. Reserve Sys. (MSPB 2014). “198 , 199-200 (1980) (the separation of a term appointee at the expiration of the term specified at the time of appointment is not an appealable adverse action); 5 C.F.R. § 316.303 . NOTICE TO THE APPELLANT REGARDING YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS You have the right to request…”
Steele v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 20 F. App'x 863 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “See 5 C.F.R. § 316.303 (b); Prewitt v. Merit Sys.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.