5 C.F.R. § 330.703
Agency responsibilities for deciding who is well-qualified
(a) Agencies must define “well-qualified” for their specific vacancies, consistent with this subpart, and uniformly apply that definition to all ICTAP eligibles being considered for the vacancy.
(b) Agencies must conduct an independent second review and document the specific job-related reasons whenever an ICTAP eligible is determined to be not well-qualified for the vacancy under the agency's definition. An agency must give the ICTAP eligible the written results of this review as required by § 330.706(d).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2000–2000 · leading case: MacDonald v. Cohen, 233 F.3d 648 (1st Cir. 2000).
MacDonald v. Cohen, 233 F.3d 648 (1st Cir. 2000). “” 5 C.F.R. § 330.703 (b)(4). 4 The parties agree that MacDonald is a qualified recovered disability annuitant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.