C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 353—RESTORATION TO DUTY FROM UNIFORMED SERVICE OR COMPENSABLE INJURY › Subpart B—Uniformed Service

5 C.F.R. § 353.201

Introduction

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 revised and strengthened the existing Veterans' Reemployment Rights law, made the Department of Labor responsible for investigating employee complaints, required OPM to place certain returning employees in other agencies, established a separate restoration rights program for employees of the intelligence agencies, and altered the appeals rights process. The new law applies to persons exercising restoration rights on or after December 12, 1994.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: Kenneth M. Allen v. United States Postal Serv., 142 F.3d 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kenneth M. Allen v. United States Postal Serv., 142 F.3d 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1998). · cites it 2× “The USPS also stated that although its regulations require that employees on military duty be considered for promotions during their absence, 5 C.F.R. § 353.201 (a) (1994) (“promotion plans must provide a mechanism by which employees who are absent because of .”
Peter A Blevins v. United States Postal Serv. (MSPB 2024). “309 , 312 (2001) (observing that restoration rights accrue to employees who were separated or furloughed from a position without time limitation as a result of a compensable injury); 5 C.F.R. § 353.201 (b) (explaining that OPM’s restoration regulations cover an individual “who…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.