5 C.F.R. § 353.301

Restoration rights

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Fully recovered within 1 year. An employee who fully recovers from a compensable injury within 1 year from the date eligibility for compensation began (or from the time compensable disability recurs if the recurrence begins after the employee resumes regular full-time employment with the United States), is entitled to be restored immediately and unconditionally to his or her former position or an equivalent one. Although these restoration rights are agencywide, the employee's basic entitlement is to the former position or equivalent in the local commuting area the employee left. If a suitable vacancy does not exist, the employee is entitled to displace an employee occupying a continuing position under temporary appointment or tenure group III. If there is no such position in the local commuting area, the agency must offer the employee a position (as described above) in another location. This paragraph also applies when an injured employee accepts a lower-grade position in lieu of separation and subsequently fully recovers. A fully recovered employee is expected to return to work immediately upon the cessation of compensation.

(b) Fully recovered after 1 year. An employee who separated because of a compensable injury and whose full recovery takes longer than 1 year from the date eligibility for compensation began (or from the time compensable disability recurs if the recurrence begins after the injured employee resumes regular full-time employment with the United States), is entitled to priority consideration, agencywide, for restoration to the position he or she left or an equivalent one provided he or she applies for reappointment within 30 days of the cessation of compensation. Priority consideration is accorded by entering the individual on the agency's reemployment priority list for the competitive service or reemployment list for the excepted service. If the individual cannot be placed in the former commuting area, he or she is entitled to priority consideration for an equivalent position elsewhere in the agency. (See parts 302 and 330 of this chapter for more information on how this may be accomplished for the excepted and competitive services, respectively.) This subpart also applies when an injured employee accepts a lower-graded position in lieu of separation and subsequently fully recovers.

(c) Physically disqualified. An individual who is physically disqualified for the former position or equivalent because of a compensable injury, is entitled to be placed in another position for which qualified that will provide the employee with the same status, and pay, or the nearest approximation thereof, consistent with the circumstances in each case. This right is agencywide and applies for a period of 1 year from the date eligibility for compensation begins. After 1 year, the individual is entitled to the rights accorded individuals who fully or partially recover, as applicable.

(d) Partially recovered. Agencies must make every effort to restore in the local commuting area, according to the circumstances in each case, an individual who has partially recovered from a compensable injury and who is able to return to limited duty. At a minimum, this would mean treating these employees substantially the same as other handicapped individuals under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. (See 29 U.S.C. 791(b) and 794.) If the individual fully recovers, he or she is entitled to be considered for the position held at the time of injury, or an equivalent one. A partially recovered employee is expected to seek reemployment as soon as he or she is able.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 138 cases (55 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Roseanne Cronin v. United States Postal Serv., 2022 MSPB 13 (MSPB 2022).
Roseanne Cronin v. United States Postal Serv., 2022 MSPB 13 (MSPB 2022). · cites it 18× “5 C.F.R. § 353.301 ; see Smith v. U.S. Postal Service, 81 M.”
Randall Desjardin v. U.S. Postal Serv., 2023 MSPB 6 (MSPB 2023). · cites it 13× “6 ANALYSIS To establish jurisdiction over his restoration claim as a partially recovered employee, the appellant must show that the agency failed to meet its minimum obligation under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (d). ¶10 The Federal Employees’ Compensation Act provides, among other…”
Bledsoe v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 659 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 2011). · cites it 10× “Employees who recover fully within a year have the unconditional right to restoration under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (a) and 5 U.S.C. § 8151 (b)(1).”
Cynthia K. Walley v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 279 F.3d 1010 (Fed. Cir. 2002). · cites it 13× “Walley failed to establish that the Board erred in concluding that she had not been denied restoration rights under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (d), we affirm the Board’s decision dismissing Ms.”
Gallo v. United States, 76 Fed. Cl. 593 (Fed. Cl. 2007). · cites it 7× “The first ruling centered on 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (b) (2007), a regulation which implements 5 U.”
Rosemary Jenkins v. United States Postal Serv., 2023 MSPB 8 (MSPB 2023). · cites it 6× “¶9 The administrative judge also observed that, in light of OWCP’s reconsideration decision, the appellant might be able to establish jurisdiction over a claim that she was improperly denied restoration as a partially recovered employee under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 . RID at 15-16.…”
Cory Owens v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 2023 MSPB 7 (MSPB 2023). · cites it 2× “Under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (a), an employee who fully recovers from a work-related injury within 1 year from the date eligibility for compensation began is entitled to restoration to his former position or an equivalent one.”
Speed v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 58 (Fed. Cl. 2011). · cites it 2× “29, 2006)) (citing 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (b)). The Board found that the USPS had given Ms.”
King v. Dep't of the Navy, 167 F. App'x 191 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “” 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (b). The Board found that King’s commuting area was the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard commuting area.”
Gallo v. Dep't of Transp., 689 F.3d 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2012). · cites it 3× “as a result of a compensable injury”; and OPM regulations 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (a) and (b) define an eligible employee under § 8151(b)(1) and (2) to include an employee who “accepts a lower-graded position in lieu of separation and subsequently fully recovers” (emphases added).”
Adrienne L. Curry v. Sec'y, Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 518 F. App'x 957 (11th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “” 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (d). Curry contends that the VA failed to comply with these provisions by refusing to restore her between 2004 and 2008.”
Deonne R. New v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 142 F.3d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “See 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (b). In contrast, when an employee’s recovery from a compensable injury takes more than one year, as did Ms.”
— 5 C.F.R. § 353.301(d) — 6 cases
Bledsoe v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 659 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 2011). “Employees who recover fully within a year have the unconditional right to restoration under 5 C.F.R. § 353.301 (a) and 5 U.S.C. § 8151 (b)(1).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.