5 C.F.R. § 550.901

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart prescribes the regulations required by sections 5545(d) and 5548(b) of title 5, United States Code, for the payment of differentials for duty involving unusual physical hardship or hazard to employees.

[56 FR 20344, May 3, 1991]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2023 · leading case: Bevelheimer v. United States, 4 Cl. Ct. 558 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
Bevelheimer v. United States, 4 Cl. Ct. 558 (Ct. Cl. 1984). · cites it 2× “5545(d) if they met the criteria established by that section of law and the implementing regulations, 5 C.F.R. 550.901, et seq.; U.S. Army Armament Research and Development Command, Regulation No.”
Adams v. United States, 59 F.4th 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2023). “Pursuant to congressional delegation, OPM (and its predecessor) promulgated 5 C.F.R. § 550.901 et seq., covering hazardous duty pay, and 5 C.”
Roepsch v. Bentsen, 846 F. Supp. 1363 (E.D. Wis. 1994). “Second, Smith and Brown rely on regulations issued by the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”), 5 C.F.R. § 550.901 et seq., *1372 to conclude that the “appropriate authority” under the Act encompasses “courts” and that “adverse personnel actions” include a “discrimination…”
Gladstone Booth v. The United States, 436 F.2d 474 (Ct. Cl. 1971). “The Regulations established by the Civil Service Commission (CSC) pursuant to the statute, supra, are found in 5 C.F.R. § 550.901 et seq. (1969). Most pertinent is § 550.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.