5 C.F.R. § 575.305

Applicability to employees

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) An agency may pay a retention incentive to an individual employee under the conditions prescribed in this subpart when the agency determines that—

(1) The unusually high or unique qualifications (i.e., competencies) of the employee or a special need of the agency for the employee's services makes it essential to retain the employee; and

(2) The employee would be likely to leave the Federal service in the absence of a retention incentive.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, an agency may pay a retention incentive to a group or category of employees under the conditions prescribed in this subpart when the agency determines that—

(1) The unusually high or unique qualifications (i.e., competencies) of the group or category of employees or a special need of the agency for the employees' services makes it essential to retain the employees in that group or category; and

(2) There is a high risk that a significant number of the employees in the group would be likely to leave the Federal service in the absence of a retention incentive.

(c) An agency may not include in a group retention incentive authorization an employee covered by § 575.303(a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(5) or those in similar categories of positions approved by OPM to receive retention incentives under § 575.303(a)(7).

(d) A retention incentive may be paid only when the employee's rating of record (or an official performance appraisal or evaluation under a system not covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 or 5 CFR part 430) is at least “Fully Successful” or equivalent.

[70 FR 25747, May 13, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 49364, Aug. 14, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Hindman v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 97 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
Hindman v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 97 (Fed. Cl. 2017). · cites it 2× “] ”); 5 C.F.R. § 575.305 (b) (stating that an agency “may pay” a retention bonus to a group of employees if they possess “unusually high or unique qualifications” or there is otherwise a “high risk that a significant number of the employees in the group would be likely to leave”…”
Hindman v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). · cites it 2× “]”); 5 C.F.R. § 575.305 (b) (stating that an agency “may pay” a retention bonus to a group 11 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.