5 C.F.R. § 733.107
Designated localities
(a) When OPM determines that, because of special or unusual circumstances, it is in the domestic interest of employees to participate in local elections, OPM may specify as a designated locality:
(1) The District of Columbia,
(2) A municipality or political subdivision in Maryland or Virginia and in the immediate vicinity of the District of Columbia, or
(3) A municipality in which the majority of voters are employed by the Government of the United States.
(b) Information as to the documentation required to support a request for designation is furnished by the General Counsel of OPM on request.
(c) The following municipalities and political subdivisions have been designated, effective on the day specified:
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Keith Arnold v. Keith L. Arnold (MSPB 2023).
Keith Arnold v. Keith L. Arnold (MSPB 2023). “3 5 C.F.R. § 733.107 (c). Therefore, the only issue in dispute is whether the respondent ran in a nonpartisan political election.”
Arnold v. MSPB (Fed. Cir. 2023). “First, federal employees who live in certain localities (such as the District of Columbia, see 5 C.F.R. § 733.107 ) may “[r]un as an independent candidate in a partisan elec- tion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.