5 C.F.R. § 772.101

Basic authority

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part establishes a mechanism for agencies to provide interim relief to employees and applicants for employment who prevail in an initial decision issued by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) as required by the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, Pub. L. 101-12 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 7701(b)(2)(A)). The interim relief provisions of the law are applicable whether or not alleged reprisal for whistleblowing is at issue in an appeal to MSPB.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1976–1983 · leading case: Hycle L. Noland v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n, 544 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hycle L. Noland v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n, 544 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1976). “*334 On July 21, 1976, the Federal Employees Appeals Authority, which has authority to make final decisions on appeals to the United States Civil Service Commission, see 5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101 , et seq., filed an order denying petitioner’s claim concerning a reduction in force…”

Donnie A. Ward v. Alan K. Campbell, Etc., 610 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1980). “See 5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101 , 772.307(b) (1978). 2 The hearing was unusual because the army did not attempt to defend its decision to downgrade plaintiffs.”

McLean v. United States Postal Serv., 544 F. Supp. 821 (W.D. Pa. 1982). “5 C.F.R. § 772.101 (1978). The FEAA and the Civil Service Commission no longer exist.”

Peele v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 419 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101 et seq. (1978). Accordingly, an Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) investigator was assigned to investigate plaintiff’s complaint.”

Atwell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 670 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “203 (1978); 5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101 -.404 (1978). For the purposes of the present litigation, the critical point to note regarding the preCSRA civil service laws is that the employee whose grade was lowered had the right to challenge the agency action in two distinct ways: first,…”

Edwards v. Crosby, 540 F. Supp. 60 (E.D. Pa. 1982). “211-283 (1982) (current regulations); 5 C.F.R. §§ 772.101 -.312 (1976) (former regulations governing adverse-action appeals of agency adverse actions), with 5 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.