5 C.F.R. § 831.1201
Introduction
This subpart sets out the requirements an employee must meet to qualify for disability retirement, how an employee applies for disability retirement, how an agency applies for disability retirement for an employee, when a disability annuity ends, an individual's retirement rights after the disability annuity ends, and the effect of reemployment in the Federal service on a disability annuitant.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1981–1983 · leading case: Otto H. Lizut v. Dep't of the Army, 717 F.2d 1391 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
Otto H. Lizut v. Dep't of the Army, 717 F.2d 1391 (Fed. Cir. 1983). “5 CFR 831.1201(b) (1980). It is therefore OPM that decides whether the available evidence establishes with sufficient certainty that a mental condition is the cause of disability, not the employing agency.”
Shao v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 702 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “The plaintiff also contends that "[a]s a matter of law, refusal to take a psychiatric examination is not grounds for termination” and that "[t]he only fitness-for-duty examinations authorized in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and the Federal Procurement Manual (FPM) are…”
— 5 C.F.R. § 831.1201(b) — 1 case
Otto H. Lizut v. Dep't of the Army, 717 F.2d 1391 (Fed. Cir. 1983). “5 CFR 831.1201(b) (1980). It is therefore OPM that decides whether the available evidence establishes with sufficient certainty that a mental condition is the cause of disability, not the employing agency.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.