C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS › PART 831—RETIREMENT › Subpart O—Allotments From Civil Service Annuities

5 C.F.R. § 831.1511

Authorized allottees

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) An annuitant may make an allotment to the national office or headquarters of any of the following organizations:

(1) A labor organization recognized under Executive Order 11491, as amended;

(2) An employee organization recognized under 5 U.S.C. 8901(8);

(3) Other lawful organizations which:

(i) Are national in scope,

(ii) Are nonprofit and noncommercial, existing primarily for the purpose of representing employee or annuitant interests in their dealings with employing agencies or OPM,

(iii) Consist primarily of Federal employees and/or annuitants, and

(iv) Existed as of December 23, 1975.

(b) OPM, in its sole discretion, may approve the individual organizations which may receive allotments only after the organization has collected, in accordance with procedures prescribed by OPM, a minimum of two thousand (2,000) allotment authorizations from civil service annuitants.

(c) OPM shall permit an annuitant to make an allotment to an organization only when:

(1) The organization has been approved as an allottee by OPM, and

(2) The organization has agreed in writing to solicit and process allotments in accordance with requirements prescribed by OPM.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2010 · leading case: Byrum v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 618 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Byrum v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 618 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2010). “The Government then cites a CSRS regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 831.1511 , which permits “allotments” from annuity payments to labor, employment, and similar organizations, and concludes that CSRS does not recognize assignments to individuals.”
SSA Baltimore Fed. Credit Union v. Bizon, 42 B.R. 338 (D. Maryland 1984). “See 5 C.F.R. §§ 831.1511 (a) & 831.1521(h) (1983).”
Neikirk v. Apfel, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (D. Colo. 2000). “§ 8345 (h) to an assignment of survivor annuity benefits due to his mother because he was not an “allottee” as described in 5 C.F.R. § 831.1511 ). 3 *1294 IV. CONCLUSION For the aforesaid reasons, I conclude the Commissioner applied the correct legal standards in reaching the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.