5 C.F.R. § 831.909
Reemployment
An employee who has been mandatorily separated under 5 U.S.C. 8335(b) is not barred from reemployment in any position except a primary position after age 60. Service by a reemployed annuitant is not covered by the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336(c).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2001–2014 · leading case: Buckley v. United States, 57 Fed. Cl. 328 (Fed. Cl. 2003).
Buckley v. United States, 57 Fed. Cl. 328 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “5 C.F.R. § 831.909 . The plaintiff does not claim that either the employee or the DEA ever had the opportunity to conduct pretrial discovery, present memoranda of law, conduct examinations or cross-examinations of witnesses, introduce exhibits, or object to any evidence…”
Crowley v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 737 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “After reviewing the employee’s application, including any documentary evidence and DEA’s recommendation, OPM would issue a final determination based on the papers, 5 C.F.R. § 831.909 . The plaintiff does not claim that either the employee or the DEA ever had the opportunity to…”
Buckley v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 174 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “5 C.F.R. § 831.909 . The plaintiff does not claim that either the employee or the DEA ever had the opportunity to conduct pretrial discovery, present memoranda of law, conduct examinations or cross-examinations of witnesses, introduce exhibits, or object to any evidence…”
Barry A. Ormond v. Dep't of Just. (MSPB 2014). “4 The appellant’s citation to 5 C.F.R. § 831.909 , PFR File, Tab 1 at 12-13, which states that an employee who has been mandatorily separated under 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.