50 C.F.R. § 10.11
Scope of definitions
In addition and subject to definitions contained in applicable statutes and subsequent parts or sections of this subchapter B, words or their variants shall have the meanings ascribed in this subpart. Throughout this subchapter B words in the singular form shall include the plural, words in the plural form shall include the singular, and words in the masculine form shall include the feminine.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–2009 · leading case: United States v. Ronald Hubert Conners, 606 F.2d 269 (10th Cir. 1979).
United States v. Ronald Hubert Conners, 606 F.2d 269 (10th Cir. 1979). “” This definition is applicable throughout Subchapter B (see 50 C.F.R. § 10.11 ) on the “Taking, Possession .”
United States v. Gilkerson, 556 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2009). “50 C.F.R. § 10.11 . “Person” is not otherwise defined in the applicable subchapters.”
United States v. William Franklin Chew, III, 540 F.2d 759 (4th Cir. 1976). “50 C.F.R. § 10.11 (d) We agree with Chew that this definition is vague, ambiguous and overbroad as applied to a “bag limit.”
United States v. Caleb Gilkerson (8th Cir. 2009). “50 C.F.R. § 10.11 . "Person" is not otherwise defined in the applicable subchapters.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.