C.F.R. » Title 50 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—TAKING, POSSESSION, TRANSPORTATION, SALE, PURCHASE, BARTER, EXPORTATION, AND IMPORTATION OF WILDLIFE AND PLANTS › PART 17—ENDANGERED AND THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS › Subpart A—Introduction and General Provisions

50 C.F.R. § 17.1

Purpose of regulations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The regulations in this part implement the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 87 Stat. 884, 16 U.S.C. 1531-1543, except for those provisions in the Act concerning the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, for which regulations are provided in part 23 of this subchapter.

(b) The regulations identify those species of wildlife and plants determined by the Director to be endangered or threatened with extinction under section 4(a) of the Act and also carry over the species and subspecies of wildlife designated as endangered under the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 275, 16 U.S.C. 668cc-1 to 6) which are deemed endangered species under section 4(c)(3) of the Act.

[40 FR 44415, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2000 · leading case: Wyoming Farm Bureau Fed'n v. Babbitt, 199 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wyoming Farm Bureau Fed'n v. Babbitt, 199 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2× “, bald eagles, which until 1978 were listed as endangered south of 40 degrees north latitude, while those to the north were unlisted [ 50 C.F.R. § 17.1 l(i)(l 977), revised at 43 Fed.”
Friends of the Wild Swan, Inc. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 945 F. Supp. 1388 (D. Or. 1996). “50 C.F.R. § 17.1 . The National Marine Fisheries Service has been delegated ESA listing responsibilities for marine species.”
Mountain States Legal Found. v. Clark, 740 F.2d 792 (10th Cir. 1984). “§ 1539 (1982); 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.1 to 17.40. It is important to set forth the detailed parallels in other government statutes and regulations in order to understand what is at stake in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.