7 C.F.R. § 1.130
Meaning of words
As used in this subpart, words in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may require.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2024 · leading case: Utica Packing Co. & David Fenster v. John R. Block, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Agric., 781 F.2d 71 (6th Cir. 1986).
Utica Packing Co. & David Fenster v. John R. Block, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Agric., 781 F.2d 71 (6th Cir. 1986). “7 C.F.R. § 1.130 , et seq. (1985). When an administrator of an agency within the USDA files a complaint with the Secretary the matter is referred to an administrative law judge (AU).”
Preach Fleming, Albert Lee Rowland & C.H. Meadows, Joe Fleming v. United States Dep't of Agric., 713 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1983). “See 7 C.F.R. § 1.130 et seq. (Title 7, Subtitle A, Sub-part H of Part 1).”
Marshall Chernin v. Richard E. Lyng, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Agric., 874 F.2d 501 (8th Cir. 1989). “The statutory provision for a right to an administrative hearing and judicial review mentions only the firms that seek inspection services; the Act does not explicitly give employees like Chernin, whose jobs may be forfeited by a determination of unfitness, a separate right to…”
Wayne Cusimano, Inc. v. John R. Block, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Agric., 692 F.2d 1025 (5th Cir. 1982). “See 7 C.F.R. §§ 1.130 -.151. Originally enacted in 1930, the Act regulates the perishable agricultural commodities industries and promotes fair dealings in transactions with regard to fresh fruits and vegetables.”
Nebraska Beef, Ltd. v. Greening, 398 F.3d 1080 (8th Cir. 2005). “See 7 C.F.R. § 1.130 et. seq. (2005). Under those regulations, an aggrieved party may file a complaint if there "is reason to believe that a person has violated or is violating any provision of [inter alia, the FMIA] or of any regulation, standard, instruction or order issued…”
Daul v. Meckus, 897 F. Supp. 606 (D.D.C. 1995). “Furthermore, while the government has not made this argument, Supreme Court precedent suggests that a Bivens action is not available to plaintiff because Congress has provided in the AWA itself for an elaborate process, including multi-level administrative procedures and…”
Lancelot Kollman Ramos v. US Dept. of Agric., 322 F. App'x 814 (11th Cir. 2009). “On May 2, 2005, a hearing clerk from the Office of Administrative Law Judges sent to Kollman by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the Complaint, the Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by the Secretary Under Various Statutes…”
Dustman v. United Soybean Bd. (E.D. Mo. 2024). “See 7 C.F.R. §§ 1.130 to 1.151, discussed in §§ 34:1 to 34:74.”
Goetz v. United States, 99 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (D. Kan. 2000). “316) (“Beef Promotion Regulations”); and the Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory Proceedings Instituted by the Secretary Under Various Statutes ( 7 C.F.R. §§ 1.130 -.151) (“Rules of Practice”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.